| |
|
|
| |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
|
"Rants and Raves" is an open forum for coaches to
discuss topics, ranging from issues to observations on
the state of college basketball and beyond. |
| |
The Great Migration
By Seth Greenberg, Virginia Tech
Much has been made about the 'new
landscape' of college athletics.
The departure of Miami, Virginia
Tech and Boston College, from the
Big East to Atlantic Coast
Conference, created a void, which
was quickly filled.
But while the arrival of
Cincinnati, DePaul, Louisville,
Marquette and South Florida
garners big headlines, it is
simply nothing new in college
athletics. Every year there is
change, across the board.
At the mid-major level there is
seemingly constant migration. Last
year Jacksonville State and
Samford faced off against
competition in the Atlantic Sun
Conference. This season those two
institutions are members of the
Ohio Valley Conference.
With the exception of Independents
and schools making the jump to
division I, anytime there is
migration it obviously changes the
landscape of at least two
conferences. But while the recent
changes in the ACC, A-10, Big East
and C-USA are familiar to
virtually anyone that follows
college athletics, the new-look
Atlantic Sun and OVC simply didn't
get much national attention.
The realignment of the 'power
conferences' is big news for the
landscape of college athletics,
but for years there has been a
great migration among 'smaller
profile' schools.
Such changes aren't as visible,
but they have become common place.
In 1998 Lamar, Louisiana Tech,
Jacksonville and Texas Pan
American were all members of the
Sun Belt Conference. Three of
those four schools are in
different leagues now, with Pan
American being an Independent.
If you go back seven years earlier
(1991) you will find South Alabama
and Western Kentucky to be the
only two members of the Sun Belt
that are still affiliated with the
league today.
In a little more than a decade the
face of the Sun Belt has
completely changed.
Remember the Eastern 8? First
Villanova and later Pittsburgh
left to join the emerging Big East
Conference. The Eastern 8 then
added four new schools and became
the Atlantic 10.
And what ever happened to the
Metro Conference? Well, it changed
membership and became the Great
Midwest Conference, which in turn
went through change and became
Conference USA.
With few exceptions, over the past
10-15 years your favorite
conference has undoubtedly gone
through change. What we are
witnessing now is simply nothing
new.
So why all the change? Sure money
is a major contributing factor,
but much of the change has been
brought on by a desire to find a
good fit.
Universities want to compete in
conferences with other like
schools. If your basketball
program has an arena that hold
3,000 people you would prefer not
to be affiliated with a conference
that has members, which put 10 to
15,000 in the stands every night.
Schools look for leagues in which
the members have similar size,
similar academic standards and a
common mission. Thus, many
presidents and athletic directors
are always exploring the
possibilities of better fits for
their respective institutions.
There is no question that football
has been a driving force in
reshaping the college landscape
and anticipated this, years in
advance.
Former South Florida athletic
director, Paul Griffin was ahead
of the curve when he brought
football to USF. Had such a move
not been initiated, South Florida
would not been as attractive to
the Big East.
Nobody is naive enough to think
that college athletics is not big
business. And in big business we
witness mergers and change every
day. Those companies that thrive
are those that stay one step ahead
and put themselves in the best
situation to exceed on all levels.
In corporate America, if you align
yourself with the right people you
will improve your standing and
make your stock holders very
happy.
If you follow that same path in
college athletics you will give
your institution an opportunity to
win championships, in turn making
your fans and alumnus very happy.
Perhaps we will not see much more
movement, if any, among the 'high
profile' conferences, but we will
undoubtedly continue to see
migration in athletics as a whole. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|