Bet on Football
Football handicapping stats and wagering advice to improve your bottom line.

 
 
 
 
 
 
email Ehud Knoll
 
Seed Paradox

February 7, 2008

Will Bob McKillop and Davidson be a part of March Madness should they falter in the Southern Conference Tournament?In ancient Greek philosophy, Zeno of Elea used the Millet Seed Paradox to suggest that human senses can be insufficient and misleading indicators of reality. As you will soon see, NCAA tournament seeds are also insufficient and misleading, insomuch as they do not always correlate directly with actual tournament performance. In theory, there should be a clear, consistent relationship between a team’s tournament seed and the success it can expect to achieve. The higher your seed, the lower the seeds of your foes, and the more likely you are to advance - a straightforward intuitive concept, and one that simply is not correct. This illogical seeding paradox often goes unnoticed, but has been associated with many of the surprise runs in the 64/65-team tournament era. As we near Selection Sunday, keep it in mind as you contemplate the worthiness of your favorite team’s bracket location.

The year was 1996. Mid majors were enjoying a banner season, and several were preparing for the possibility of lengthy tournament runs. As Selection Sunday approached, three outstanding squads were gathered to find out their seed and bracket: Bradley, Eastern Michigan and Wisconsin Green Bay. All three had completed impressive regular seasons and were considered threats to advance into the second weekend. And then, the great news: Bradley and Wisconsin-GB received 8-seeds, and Eastern Michigan a 9-seed. So much respect for their success, such high seeds considering their conference affiliation, and eventually, such short stays in the actual Big Dance. Only Eastern Michigan won its first round game, and immediately faced a Final 4 favorite in top-seeded UConn, ultimately losing by 14. Since ’96, it has also happened to Illinois State, Murray State, and Bucknell, among others. An 8-9 trap in the opening round, at best followed by a quick goodbye at the hands of a 1 seed in round two. While seeds 1-6 and 15-16 show consistent patterns of tournament success very much as expected, seeds 7-12, often resided by mid majors, tell an entirely different story. From 1997 to 2007, only one single 9-seed has made the Sweet 16. I could not believe that number when I first researched it, but this is in fact true (UAB in 2004). Over that span, a 14 seed and two 13 seeds made the Sweet 16 – and here is the real kicker – thirteen 10 seeds! You read that right. Thirteen 10 seeds, one 9 seed. What about eight seeds, you ask? Five have made the Sweet 16 in those years. Five, which is the same as 12 seeds, and only one less than 11 seeds.

Think about those numbers for second – and what they mean in the grand scheme of the seeding process. Instead of rewarding teams, giving an 8 or 9 seed to an impressive mid-major candidate is frankly a near-certain second round death sentence. The reality is, the difference in Sweet 16 success rate between 1-seeds and 2-seeds is much bigger then it intuitively ought to be. It might make sense in the first round, with 16 seeds winless so far, but the second round numbers are staggering and not easily explained. Why are 2-seeds losing so often? And why are they losing to 10 seeds more than 7 seeds? There have not been any 10 seeds in the Final Four over this time period, though Kent and Gonzaga both came within a game. There really is no logical reason for these numbers, but the existence of the seeding paradox might come into play on Selection Sunday in 2008. In an ironic twist, several mid-majors with chances at upsets might in time celebrate the fact that they lost those very games!

Consider the case of Davidson, currently atop the Southern Conference with a 15-6 record. The Wildcats played UNC, Duke and UCLA in competitive games early this season, and would have been in great at-large shape had they won two of those three games. But what if they had only won one of the marquee match-ups? Would it have helped secure a dreaded 8-9 game in March, instead of a 12 or 11 seed that might await the Wildcats if they win the automatic bid? I would argue that in fact, losing all three marquee games may well benefit the Wildcats in the end. A single win would not have offset loses to NC State, UNC-Charlotte, or Western Michigan. Davidson would not have gotten a high seed like Butler or Southern Illinois last season. But, it would be difficult to give a double-digit seed to a team with a win over a likely 1 or 2 seeds. Davidson would have been destined for an 8-9 game, and a short stay in the field of 65. Western Kentucky would be in a similar boat had they hung on to beat Tennessee on December 15th. Had UNC-Ashville upset the Tar Heels in January, the Bulldogs would still likely get a seed no higher than 8 or 9, and the likely quick exit that follows. Strange as it may seem, these teams may have gained more by hanging with their highly regarded opponents than they would have by beating them. Of course the notoriety and publicity that come with an early-season upset are nice, but they are nowhere near the attention gained during a tournament run. And in order to be in a position for a successful tournament run, it is strangely better to be a 10 or 12 seed than an 8 or 9.

Got your own theory or elucidation for the seed paradox? Send me your thoughts here at College Insider, and maybe by Selection Sunday ‘08 we can put together a sound theory to explain it.


Knight in Shining Armor?

I am not surprised by Bob Knight’s resignation a Texas Tech (yet another of my 2008 conference wish list that will not come true), but let’s wait at least 3 years before declaring the Knight era truly over. Knight is a basketball lifer, and after a year or two of hunting, fishing, and cracking wise at the media, I have to believe a part of him will be itching to get back in the mix. Knight is 67, and in an age where Joe Paterno continues to coach at 81, can hardly be considered too old to come back. The list of coaches who retired, only to return successfully, is long and impressive: Dick Bennett, Homer Drew, Hugh Durham, Steve Fisher, Eddie Sutton, Lefty Driesell, and Jerry Tarkanian, among others. Pete Carril retired from Princeton, but resurfaced as an NBA assistant for another ten years. 73-year-old Howard Schnellenberger just won a bowl game at Florida Atlantic. Sure, Knight could be like Dean Smith or John Wooden, retiring from coaching once and for all. But, if his health is up to it, I would not be shocked at all to see Knight come back for a final chapter at a mid major, a low major, or perhaps even one of the service academies, bringing his career full circle.

Beware the Bid Thieves

Looking ahead to championship week, how many bid-thieves will crush the dreams of regular season champions and swipe tournament bids from right under their noses? Does anyone really expect Winthrop, Holy Cross, Southern Illinois, North Texas, etc to go quietly into the night? Not a chance. The likes of Miami (Ohio), Central Conn. State and Nevada will also be very tough outs. For upstarts like UNC-Ashville, Stephen F. Austin, Lafayette, and others, a regular season conference title will be great, but will guarantee absolutely nothing come conference tournament time.

Odds And Ends

Since freshman Tyler Newbold entered the starting lineup, Utah State has gone 11-1, with Newbold emerging as a rising star shooter in the WAC. A highly regarded recruit in 2005, Newbold completed an LDS Church Mission in 2007 and now looks like the heir apparent to Aggies star Jaycee Carroll… If the Big 10 gets more tournament bids than the ACC, does that mean the 2007 ACC-Big 10 challenge never really happened… Dayton has been crushed by the injuries to Charles Little and Chris Wright. And so has George Mason, which saw a marquee win over a top 20 opponent lose much of its luster. But on the flip side, the win over Kansas State is looking better each passing month… Cal forward Ryan Anderson has been outstanding, but don’t overlook fellow sophomore Patrick Christopher, who someday might just join Anderson in The League… Georgia Tech’s recent run of improved play coincided with the rising confidence of senior point guard Matt Causey, who followed a solid game against UNC with four straight double figure efforts. The bad news: Causey is a senior, which means next year, for the fifth straight season, the Yellow Jackets will have a new point guard running the show – not exactly the recipe for continuity.


Ehud Knoll is a sfaff writer for collegeinsider.com. EMAIL EHUD